Hi Nitsan, This draft has gone through the WGLC as well as IESG review and we are very close to its publication (i.e., too late to make such changes). Once it is published, we welcome enhancements and expansion to this document when needed. IETF has a formal process of reporting “errata” on a published RFC. We encourage you to file an errata on this. We will compile all such errata and we will address them in the bis version of this document.
Cheers, Ali From: BESS <bess-boun...@ietf.org> on behalf of Nitsan Dolev <nitsan.do...@rbbn.com> Date: Wednesday, May 17, 2023 at 7:25 AM To: bess@ietf.org <bess@ietf.org>, Parag Jain (paragj) <par...@cisco.com>, Luc Andre Burdet (lburdet) <lbur...@cisco.com> Cc: Alexander Vainshtein <alexander.vainsht...@rbbn.com>, Ron Sdayoor <ron.sday...@rbbn.com> Subject: Re: [bess] Coverage of ERL label within LSP-Ping Mechanisms for EVPN Dear authors of draft-ietf-bess-evpn-lsp-ping-09 and draft-burdet-bess-evpn-fast-reroute-03, Your help with addressing the following question will be most appreciated, As these two mentioned drafts seem to be under consensus; would not it be right to address the coverage of ERL label should within the LSP Ping enhancement for EVPN. Looking forward to getting your answer, Nitsan Dolev Ribbon Communications Notice: This e-mail together with any attachments may contain information of Ribbon Communications Inc. and its Affiliates that is confidential and/or proprietary for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any review, disclosure, reliance or distribution by others or forwarding without express permission is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and then delete all copies, including any attachments.
_______________________________________________ BESS mailing list BESS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess
