Dear Co-Authors,

Thank you for contributing this very useful document! I support the adoption of 
this document.

One comment:
Regarding the "ID Length" and "Nonce Length" in the Base (Minimal Set) DIM 
Sub-TLV, Figure 6 shows the following:
        0                   1                   2                   3
        0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0
       +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
       |   ID Length   |       Nonce Length            |I|   Flags     |
       +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
       |                             Rekey                             |
       |                            Counter                            |
       +---------------------------------------------------------------+
       |                                                               |
       ~  Originator ID + (Tenant ID) + (Subnet ID) + (Tenant Address) ~
       |                                                               |
       +---------------------------------------------------------------+
       |                                                               |
       ~                          Nonce Data                           ~
       |                                                               |
       +---------------------------------------------------------------+

                                  Figure 6


And the corresponding description is as follows:
"ID Length (16 bits) is the length of the Originator ID + (Tenant ID)
   + (Subnet ID) + (Tenant Address) in bytes.  Nonce Length (8 bits) is
..."

Question: Which is the right format we want?

Best Regards,
Shunwan
_______________________________________________
BESS mailing list
BESS@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess

Reply via email to