FYI - We deleted this report. The submitter will create a new report with the 
correct RFC number (RFC 9537 rather than 9573).

Best regards,
RFC Editor/rv


> On Jun 26, 2024, at 9:04 AM, RFC Errata System <rfc-edi...@rfc-editor.org> 
> wrote:
> 
> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC9573,
> "MVPN/EVPN Tunnel Aggregation with Common Labels".
> 
> --------------------------------------
> You may review the report below and at:
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid8005
> 
> --------------------------------------
> Type: Technical
> Reported by: James Gould <jgo...@verisign.com>
> 
> Section: 4.2
> 
> Original Text
> -------------
> The "postPath" member MUST be set when the redacted field does exist
> in the redacted response for the Redaction by Empty Value Method
> (Section 3.2), the Redaction by Partial Value Method
> (Section 3.3), and the Redaction by Replacement Value Method
> (Section 3.4).
> 
> Corrected Text
> --------------
> The "postPath" member MAY be set when the redacted field does exist
> in the redacted response for the Redaction by Empty Value Method
> (Section 3.2), the Redaction by Partial Value Method
> (Section 3.3), and the Redaction by Replacement Value Method
> (Section 3.4).
> 
> Notes
> -----
> The “postPath” member is an OPTIONAL member and this MUST can provide 
> confusion.  The intent of this sentence was to outline which of the path 
> members (“prePath”, “postPath”, and “replacementPath”) to use when using path 
> expressions and not to conflict with the OPTIONAL definition.  All of the 
> path expression members are defined as OPTIONAL in the RFC, so this MUST 
> needs be changed to a MAY to correct the confusion.
> 
> Instructions:
> -------------
> This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". (If it is spam, it 
> will be removed shortly by the RFC Production Center.) Please
> use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
> rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party  
> will log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary.
> 
> --------------------------------------
> RFC9573 (draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-evpn-aggregation-label-14)
> --------------------------------------
> Title               : MVPN/EVPN Tunnel Aggregation with Common Labels
> Publication Date    : May 2024
> Author(s)           : Z. Zhang, E. Rosen, W. Lin, Z. Li, IJ. Wijnands
> Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
> Source              : BGP Enabled ServiceS
> Stream              : IETF
> Verifying Party     : IESG
> 

_______________________________________________
BESS mailing list -- bess@ietf.org
To unsubscribe send an email to bess-le...@ietf.org

Reply via email to