Hi all, I have looked up Section 8.3.1.2 of the 7432bis draft<https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-bess-rfc7432bis-13#section-8.3.1.2>, and it looks the same as the namesake section of RFC 7432<https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc7432#section-8.3.1.2>: both documents assume that, in the case of P2MP LSPs being used for delivery of BUM traffic in EVPN, ESI labels are upstream-allocated from appropriate context label spaces.
However, RFC 7432 has been updated by RFC 9573<https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc9573> with regard to allocation of ESI labels: these labels can be allocated from the Domain Common Block (DCB) per MH ES by an external management entity and not from the contest-specific label space. Such usage MUST be indicating by setting the DCB Flag in the PTA in the IMET (EVPN Type 3) route. The metadata for RFC 7432 explicitly states that it is updated by RFC 9573 - but this update seems to be ignored in the 7432bis draft. What, if anything, did I miss? Regards, and lost of thanks in advance, Sasha Disclaimer This e-mail together with any attachments may contain information of Ribbon Communications Inc. and its Affiliates that is confidential and/or proprietary for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any review, disclosure, reliance or distribution by others or forwarding without express permission is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and then delete all copies, including any attachments.
_______________________________________________ BESS mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
