> On Aug 26, 2025, at 8:07 AM, Robert Raszuk <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi Srihari, > > As it turns out this is not about transitivity but origination so has nothing > to do with T flag.
This update has everything to do with the treatment of the T flag when interacting with iBGP vs. eBGP speakers. You're in the rough if you believe otherwise. The discussion point and your suggestion about the wording vs. attached has been already noted.[1] > Apparently there seems to be a prior art to preserve authors even if they are > not email reachable. The IESG has provided statements covering this: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/statement-iesg-statement-on-addressing-comments-and-crediting-contributions/ https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/statement-iesg-iesg-statement-on-internet-draft-authorship-20210510/ The next update[2] will include Srihari as a top of document author since he is still active and supportive of the effort and include Nat Kao as the editor. -- Jeff [1] https://github.com/ietf-wg-idr/draft-ietf-idr-rfc4360-bis/issues/5 [2] Tracked here: https://github.com/ietf-wg-idr/draft-ietf-idr-rfc4360-bis/issues/4 _______________________________________________ BESS mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
