>1. What about vlan-aware bundle? Is the vlan tag included in the encapsulated 
>frame? There is no text for that.
>2. For vlan bundle service, is the vlan tag optional or mandated in the 
>encapsulated frame?


In the context of VLAN-aware and VLAN-based services, the VLAN tag is optional. 
 A scenario where the VLAN tag is carried is when the .1P bits need to be 
preserved end to end.

>We are also wondering how to implement the "VLAN-aware bundle service" in the 
>data plane.

Data plane sees no difference between the three service types w.r.to 
identifying the bridge domain. In all services, the bridge table is identified 
using the VNI.

>for LSI bundle service.
For the scenarios captured in the document, did you explore double VxLAN 
encapsulation instead of protocol changes and custom modifications to VxLAN 
header? VxLAN packets that are received CE traverses the MAN network and 
reaches PE which then encapsulates the received frame in VxLAN encapsulation 
and sends it to other PE’'s.  Receiving PE decapsulates the outer VxLAN header 
and forwards it to the CE.

Thanks,
Selvakumar



Juniper Business Use Only

From: Aijun Wang <[email protected]>
Date: Monday, September 1, 2025 at 12:27
To: 'Jeffrey (Zhaohui) Zhang' <[email protected]>, 'BESS' 
<[email protected]>
Subject: [bess] Re: VXLAN encapsulation question

[External Email. Be cautious of content]


Hi, Jeffrey:

There are several occurrences for "VLAN-aware bundle service" in RFC 8365, but 
they focus mainly on the control plane advertisements, not the encapsulation 
data plane.
We are also wondering how to implement the "VLAN-aware bundle service" in the 
data plane.

If there is none, should we consider to standardize it?
This is also the reason of extension that is described in 
https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-wang-bess-l3-accessible-evpn/__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!HLiopGnAVNJstDNrf3QL0LvigYTp0pOKbQQ29koU6KZ9azStYREbdVDklnsJEMmG521a3MoBQMaewqipn62Q63Tb$
  for LSI bundle service.

Aijun Wang
China Telecom

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On 
Behalf Of Jeffrey (Zhaohui) Zhang
Sent: Friday, August 29, 2025 4:58 AM
To: 'BESS' <[email protected]>
Subject: [bess] VXLAN encapsulation question

Hi,

RFC8365 says:

   VXLAN encapsulation is based on UDP, with an 8-byte header following
   the UDP header.  VXLAN provides a 24-bit VNI, which typically
   provides a one-to-one mapping to the tenant VID, as described in
   [RFC7348].  In this scenario, the ingress VTEP does not include an
   inner VLAN tag on the encapsulated frame, and the egress VTEP
   discards the frames with an inner VLAN tag.  This mode of operation
   in [RFC7348] maps to VLAN-Based Service in [RFC7432], where a tenant
   VID gets mapped to an EVI.

   VXLAN also provides an option of including an inner VLAN tag in the
   encapsulated frame, if explicitly configured at the VTEP.  This mode
   of operation can map to VLAN Bundle Service in [RFC7432] because all
   the tenant's tagged frames map to a single bridge table / MAC-VRF,
   and the inner VLAN tag is not used for lookup by the disposition PE
   when performing VXLAN decapsulation as described in Section 6 of
   [RFC7348].

I have two questions:

1. What about vlan-aware bundle? Is the vlan tag included in the encapsulated 
frame? There is no text for that.
2. For vlan bundle service, is the vlan tag optional or mandated in the 
encapsulated frame?

I also wonder if "and the inner VLAN tag is not used for lookup by the 
disposition PE
   when performing VXLAN decapsulation as described in Section 6 of
   [RFC7348]" should be part of the reason (the text follows "because ..."), or 
the following text is better?

   ... This mode
   of operation can map to VLAN Bundle Service in [RFC7432] because all
   the tenant's tagged frames map to a single bridge table / MAC-VRF,
   *though* the inner VLAN tag is not used for lookup by the disposition PE
   when performing VXLAN decapsulation as described in Section 6 of
   [RFC7348].

i.e., s/and/though/
In fact, I wonder if "because" should also be changed to "where".

Thanks.
Jeffrey

Juniper Business Use Only

_______________________________________________
BESS mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]

_______________________________________________
BESS mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
_______________________________________________
BESS mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]

Reply via email to