Mohamed Boucadair has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-evpn-sr-p2mp-16: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-evpn-sr-p2mp/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Hi Rishabh, Daniel, Clarence, Hooman, and Jeffrey, The changes made in -16 [1] addresses all DISCUSS/COMMENT points raised in my previous ballot [2]. Thank you. Please find below some very minor nits in -16, fwiw: Please find below some nits I tagged when reviewing the latest version: 3.2.1.1.2: The SRv6 Endpoint Behavior of the SRv6 SID Information Sub-TLV encodes one of End.DTMC4, End.DTMC6 or End.DTMC46 Section 3.1 code point values. ^^^^^^^^^^ 3.3.2: The SRv6 Endpoint Behavior of the SRv6 SID Information Sub-TLV MUST encode one of End.DTMC4, End.DTMC6 or End.DTMC46 Section 3.1 code point value. ^^^^^^^^^^^^ 4.1.2.1: The split-horizon procedures specified in P2MP MPLS LSPs Section 8.3.1.2 of [RFC7432] are sufficient for SR P2MP P-tunnels. ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Cheers, Med [1] https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url1=draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-evpn-sr-p2mp-15&url2=draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-evpn-sr-p2mp-16&difftype=--html [2] https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bess/1QhhIKz_tE427kAsXLKMi_q6bkE/ _______________________________________________ BESS mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
