Hi,
I have looked up the 00-revision of the 6514bis
draft<https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-bess-rfc6514bis-00>, and
I have a few short comments:
1. I think that the bis draft should contain a list of differences from the
original RFC, but I do not find it in this case
2. Specifically, none of the following is mentioned:
* RFC 6515 about usage of infrastructure addresses in the NLRI of the
MCAST-VPN routes. This is very important because my colleagues have encountered
a certain TEQ that reports S-PMSI routes with AFI 2 and IPv4 Originating
Router's address as malformed
* RFC 6625 (wildcard)
3. I believe we have earlier discussed the problems associated with using
the same RD in MVRF in different PEs to which a certain C-S is multihomed. But
in the draft, just as in the original FC 6514, the requirement for unique RDs
is limited to just the case of non-congruent unicast and multicast routing
topologies.
Your timely feedback would be highly appreciated
Regards,
Sasha
Disclaimer
This e-mail together with any attachments may contain information of Ribbon
Communications Inc. and its Affiliates that is confidential and/or proprietary
for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any review, disclosure, reliance or
distribution by others or forwarding without express permission is strictly
prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender
immediately and then delete all copies, including any attachments.
_______________________________________________
BESS mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
