Gunter,
Lots of thanks for a prompt response, just wanted to be sure that this was not 
lost.

Regards,
Sasha

From: Gunter van de Velde (Nokia) 
<[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, July 22, 2026 8:05 AM
To: Alexander Vainshtein <[email protected]>; 
'[email protected]' <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: Erratum 9000 on RFC 9135

Hi Sasha, Thanks for your follow up and the reporting of this errata. This 
delay is on me. I saw your reported errata but did not come to process it due 
to other priorities. Yesterday I had a chat with BESS chairs and will soon 
check with BESS WG. There are two open BESS errata currently to proce
[Image removed by 
sender.]<https://report.mimecastcybergraph.com/?magiclink=https%3A%2F%2Fapi.services.mimecast.com%2Foauth2%2Fauthorize%3Fresponse_type%3Dcode%26client_id%3Do20nRkVXf7VUVnANkXhoOwGytEwGN0YAlyeDJn7oBTGNl2kN%26state%3DeyJhbGciOiJSU0EtT0FFUC0yNTYiLCJlbmMiOiJBMjU2R0NNIn0.O84j_EcMjqbpkGRdMP0_zMJrXtL8bKW57cE_mvq4eXoqmFSPfGqE081UdzOW-deZ_51Z2mGTbDS3l4hbVN1dxjqaZWA2XrauEB1vtpTqU5qVe9sNnqaYnTPNh6pgThYCKowmdZVinuW-qW9BUvDjG6HNTbbFDeH3oeB78qp5FDl91X6Wo9AkUjGr7C4RJPahRO07dBB9P1IE3c4t2hFPStXWkiyT5HWCR9DMV5fsyZ6ZseMcTfmsuB6Uy8mkYGQXDmc6PLRTqSwib_ZeW8pZy5AvV1VR5rz0KKhyKOqkeLS0Yx6PQjjAZlfuH6clr1dDSKBy9uG7QM-cOmGJAaU0sg.zO2BxBXyeY2hzKeg.8s9DvGtjgjuche45KwAKjx6QujqMKk22siZ7TnvY0HRN6MtP9zPzNuZ3JsAWwnrhxM8roJk2bRmY0DE3nvSdqFyr4Pmw7EU9dj-DWK_SJht5dw_8clhvpMc4y7lqsyfcHxBJpdAJ6Xa0cfdssRrw-k_8OzBTayKggM1I7Uv_1ISjU4rGazWcz4G0mCTiFq8cn-a53ndnVeELn-19QJk3Cie-UBG4cHMCJza0UR83PINh2JKPbLwgLzKsst876fPGeeFnGrk3Xcj3zRiiyRScKKfbS6B0y4LtwwYqra0Eio-57PNEwq_2HN6_caPXhcOPmdHzYKU40QFN3HeMTrSHeUAmHizqxuX2-VlGI3KenYuww_yWdkD2Jb0loO44GFTAm8WtvLpTRDq2_hg29vZRT2QJdDmIexufJDNe-o8VcWjpRSTXDUePu7o4menJocq3owi-8FTHxN1iMxmn_yXXLLr1qkq5hAtqtyeFc6331Zr-nlcf0D_UJ88xoxZ4EaCrYnNCti2fIJEfZm0-dOk8J3Oegy3LJ8yqGDtG3l9ik4UVx1Prm3yQzhAhzh3__5lektBuTmjdekwpTfHWnYv55mkeK9xontyhTvBn1-XUO7Lx5k5-QPf3Ehj_FFtlDp_61cee-CC1XuscSiXJkVCPK_wzUvPwl6sYgayZevX5StElSxFYNO78bpzYECSm9F9K15JTzrkeGRBgk5NtXLFTLQx91y7Zb5UfJ8o0NFTEaFvccigpynJJ9baUWUy2JBK4h68EDodEEB0kqtkMX6MMQ31UPfa0q612s0h8VrMnbkh-GR2bC9t00vqEEz9y4bHo1dYO7apOwGN3UcUb.1FsL0QikW6_DtFSs6yL3kA%26redirect_uri%3Dhttps%3A%2F%2Freport.mimecastcybergraph.com%2Fcallback>
CGBANNERINDICATOR
Hi Sasha,

Thanks for your follow up and the reporting of this errata.

This delay is on me. I saw your reported errata but did not come to process it 
due to other priorities. Yesterday I had a chat with BESS chairs and will soon 
check with  BESS WG. There are two open BESS errata currently to process.

G/


________________________________
From: Alexander Vainshtein <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, July 20, 2026 6:05 PM
To: '[email protected]' <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected] <[email protected]>
Subject: [bess] Erratum 9000 on RFC 9135


CAUTION: This is an external email. Please be very careful when clicking links 
or opening attachments. See the URL nok.it/ext for additional information.



Hi all,

I have posted Erratum 9000 on RFC 9135<https://errata.rfc-editor.org/eid9000> 
on 10-Jun-2026 (i.e., 40 days ago).



The erratum has been recognized as Technical, but it seems to be stuck in 
Reported state.



Any ideas as to what (if anything) should be done to speed up its progress to 
Verified?



I am asking because, IMHO and FWIW it reports a real gap in RFC 9135.



My 2c,

Sasha




Disclaimer

This e-mail together with any attachments may contain information of Ribbon 
Communications Inc. and its Affiliates that is confidential and/or proprietary 
for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any review, disclosure, reliance or 
distribution by others or forwarding without express permission is strictly 
prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender 
immediately and then delete all copies, including any attachments.
_______________________________________________
BESS mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]

Reply via email to