Hi all, Two very short comments on the draft in question<https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-tantsura-bess-evpn-route-type-exp-use-00>:
1. I strongly support this draft, IMHO it is absolutely necessary 2. Regarding handing of Experimental EVPN Route Types by Route Reflectors (and issue raised by several participants during discussion): Section 5.4 of RFC 7607<https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc7606#section-5.4> says that, in the case of "typed" SAFI, BGP speakers MUST used routes of unknown types in such a SAFI using "treat as discard" -unless the relevant specification for that address family specifies otherwise. So I suggest to add the corresponding clarification to the definition of SAFI 70 in 7432bis. My 2c, Sasha Disclaimer This e-mail together with any attachments may contain information of Ribbon Communications Inc. and its Affiliates that is confidential and/or proprietary for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any review, disclosure, reliance or distribution by others or forwarding without express permission is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and then delete all copies, including any attachments.
_______________________________________________ BESS mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
