EliteAV wrote: > What was interesting is that when I ran this on my network (& I have > IPv6 disabled) after the discovery msg was sent, the decode_mac > function appeared to be called approx a dozen times with no args (hence > the screen filled up with my "missing args" msgs). This suggests that > the shell was possibly picking up responses from other network adapters > on my system (from memory, Vista appears to create a bunch of interfaces > beyond the ones you would expect from the phsyical ones). Anyway, I just > removed my debug msg and left the MAC_ZERO assignment in so this was all > handled silently. > > There was the odd occasion though where the shell ended up including > the PC itself (i.e. with MAC address of 0.0.0....) in the squeezebox > list. I vaguely recall that you have logic to check for this, so you > are probably right that this may need to be tweaked a bit to handle the > Vista network stack differences from XP. When this happened, I just > selected <configure 2> (rather than configure 1) and continued as > normal. > > I will mail you a copy of the results from IPCONFIG/ALL from my Vista > PC, however, as noted, I dont actually have IPV6 enabled. IPCONFIG has > been changed though to support IPV4 and IPV6 IP addresses.
Yeah, it's almost certainly broken on Vista. The code to get local IP address is an incredibly dirty hack so I can avoid requiring binary modules. I may come up with a better way to do that, but I doubt it. > Thanks for the suggestion about the wireless settings. I do have 2 > questions for you: When I set a 26 character hex key for one of the WEP > keys, this is displayed correctly when I <list> the settings. However, > if I then quit and perform a <discover>, <configure>, then <list> - the > WEP key isnt shown correctly (the formatting is wrong as it is shown as > 13 ASCII chars). I assume this is just a formatting issue and if I set > a key of say F9F9F9F9F9F9F9F9F9F9F9F9F9 and save it, this is exactly > what is saved? Can you send me a transcript of the shell session that produces this result? I'll look into it. There are some changes to pack/unpack in perl 5.10 that might be causing problems. R. _______________________________________________ beta mailing list beta@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/beta
