Hi Lukas, >From the video, this looks very nicely done, I'll go over the patch later.
Brecht. On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 8:22 AM, Lukas Tönne <lukas.toe...@googlemail.com> wrote: > Here's a small video demoing the feature: > > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OUidTgzy8zo > > On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 1:28 PM, Lukas Tönne > <lukas.toe...@googlemail.com> wrote: >> As part of the ongoing work on the particles-2010 branch i decided to >> address some of the nagging issues of group nodes. While nice in >> theory, the usability of node groups suffers from bad behavior and >> missing features to reveal its true power. Three things in particular >> i would like to fix: >> >> * External sockets should be renameable to give some meaning to the >> parameters and outputs of a complex group. >> * The order of external socket should be changeable (e.g. to stress >> different importance of sockets). >> * The internal sockets that get an external counterpart should be >> selectable explicitly, instead of having to use ugly workarounds to >> hide some of them. >> >> The first of these has now been implemented as a patch for trunk >> (which i will port to the particles branch too of course). It seems to >> work very well, but since i had to change some of the inner workings >> of group nodes, it could use some more testers. See the patch >> description for details. >> >> https://projects.blender.org/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=24883&group_id=9&atid=127 >> >> There are certainly more features that would be nice to have for nodes >> (nested groups, more ui improvements), but these three can be >> implemented quickly. >> >> Cheers, >> Lukas Tönne >> > _______________________________________________ > Bf-committers mailing list > Bf-committers@blender.org > http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers > _______________________________________________ Bf-committers mailing list Bf-committers@blender.org http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers