Hi Dalai, Regarding storing such stereo renders in the render results, I think we should add "views" in the same way that we have "layers" and "passes" now. OpenEXR in fact has native support for such stereo/multiview images, so it would make sense to be compatible with that and support saving and loading such EXR files.
For compositing I think you would just run compositing once for each view, similar to the way FSA runs it once for each AA sample. I don't think we should use a stereo buffer where multiple views are somehow interleaved into a single buffer, that adds quite a bit of complexity. You could have a node in the compositor which tells you which view is being composited, so that you can do different logic if you want to, and the depth of field node should perhaps work a bit different, but further the existing nodes shouldn't really have to know that they are working on a stereo image I think. On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 2:40 AM, Harley Acheson <harley.ache...@gmail.com> wrote: > This might be a silly comment but it might simplify things by removing the > need to switch into "stereoscopic" mode at all. I think a stereo checkbox is still useful, I used to think it was better to reduce the options in such cases but from experience it seems to be useful to be able to turn some effect on/off without having to remember what the setting was when you then want to turn it back on. Brecht. _______________________________________________ Bf-committers mailing list Bf-committers@blender.org http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers