On Sun, Jul 7, 2013 at 12:42 AM, David Jeske <dav...@gmail.com> wrote: > @Brecht - The proposed "WTAS" grouping does have logic behind it, but I'm > not at all saying it's the best. The main goal was trying to determine > which views in blender could be "standalone programs in their own right" > and put those into the workspaces section...Blender is useful for a heck of > alot more than the 3dview, but that functionality is dizzyingly hard to > find because those "top level program views" are mixed among views like > "properties" and "graph editor". > > I'd love to hear some more detailed feedback about grouping structure and > headings, either here, or on the bf-funboard thread... > > Here is an easier-to-view review of the better groupings I've tried so far.. > > http://dj1.willowmail.com/~jeske/Projects/Blender/ETS.html
Maybe something like this, with 2 columns: http://www.pasteall.org/43817 Not saying this is ideal, but I think trying to fit everything in columns with a single title per column constraints things too much. _______________________________________________ Bf-committers mailing list Bf-committers@blender.org http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers
