Hi Ton, those 4 point plan sounds very reasonable to me. +1 Best regards, Thomas
Am 07.08.2013 13:40, schrieb Ton Roosendaal: > A workable proposal I formulated is below, for which I'd like some feedback. > > ------ > > BF will accept add-ons in a release from commercial vendors/services under > the following conditions: > > 1) Compliancy > The add-on should comply to the same quality/design rules as we do for > regular add-ons. That includes license compliancy, but also to not include > banners, logos or advertisement. > The add-on would default be not enabled, users have to activate it themselves. > > 2) Clear user benefit > The add-on should provide functionality to 3D artists that's useful to have > inside Blender. It can't be for promotional usage of non-functional features > (like linking to websites only, for tutorials, book stores, etc). > > 3) Developed and maintained well > The add-on is being created and maintained by the service provider (or a > contracter managed by them). > > 4) Development Fund support > The service provider signs up for Diamond Sponsor level (250 euro per month). > Cancelling a payment then also means we can drop the add-on. Any service > that's not making this profits per month with an add-on, can be considered to > be not interested to have such an add-on either. > > > -Ton- > > -------------------------------------------------------- > Ton Roosendaal - t...@blender.org - www.blender.org > Chairman Blender Foundation - Producer Blender Institute > Entrepotdok 57A - 1018AD Amsterdam - The Netherlands -- Thomas Dinges Blender Developer, Artist and Musician www.dingto.org _______________________________________________ Bf-committers mailing list Bf-committers@blender.org http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers
