I think that would be a really good goal for 2.81 also. I'm personally not to sure how important backwards compatibility is, especially when fixing problems-in this case it's kind of a shame that it's not a good goal for 2.80 at this point, since there's more of an expectation that things will break. Bassam
On October 23, 2018 11:42:21 AM EDT, Ricardo Nunes <3rto...@gmail.com> wrote: >If I've understood correctly the first "public" release for 2.8 is >supposed >to be couple weeks after Bcon'18 so less than 3 weeks from now? > >I do agree, though, it'd be nice if color management could be cleaned >up in >2.81. > >ti 23. lokak. 2018 klo 17.40 Troy Sobotka (troy.sobo...@gmail.com) >kirjoitti: > >> On Tue, Oct 23, 2018, 4:07 AM Brecht Van Lommel ><brechtvanlom...@gmail.com >> > >> wrote: >> >> > For a completely >> > different config, we would need to provide some level of backwards >> > compatibility and agree on the naming, I don't think there is time >for >> > that. >> > >> >> I was under the impression 2.8 was a clean break? >> >> It strikes me as a horrible idea keeping something like the busted up >RRT >> and other crazy things in that config, doubly so that anyone can >download >> any configuration they want, or better, revert to an older version of >> Blender? >> >> The configuration really is a horrible mess and could be cleaned up >in no >> time. >> >> With respect, >> TJS >> >> > >> _______________________________________________ >> Bf-committers mailing list >> Bf-committers@blender.org >> https://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers >> >_______________________________________________ >Bf-committers mailing list >Bf-committers@blender.org >https://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers -- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. _______________________________________________ Bf-committers mailing list Bf-committers@blender.org https://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers