I usually use Copy as RIS to exchange references with the poor sods using Endnote. However recently (I think) I've noticed that BibDesk doesn't include the TY (type) of reference, which confuses Endnote no end. I'm pretty sure that RIS should always have that filled out:
http://www.refman.com/support/risformat_tags_01.asp For example this bibtex: @article{paskin2002digital-object-, Author = {Paskin, Norman}, Journal = {Information Services & Use}, Number = {2/3}, Pages = {97--113}, Title = {Digital object identifiers}, Volume = {22}, Year = {2002}} Becomes this RIS: TY - AB - Discusses developments in digital object identifier (DOI) system. Fundamental design principles of information identifiers that influence DOI; Connection between digital preservation and DOI; Types of technical interoperability; Metadata system designed for stability. AU - Paskin, Norman GR - CRI2006 JA - Information Services & Use NU - 2/3 PG - 97--113 T3 - Digital object identifiers VL - 22 Y1 - 2002 ER - Notice the empty TY field? It should, I think, be TY - JOUR Do others notice this? Is it perhaps something I've done to a template or preference to change that? Thx, James ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. Use priority code J8TL2D2. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone _______________________________________________ Bibdesk-users mailing list Bibdesk-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bibdesk-users
