Have you compared my abbrev or plain templates? I think those can give a good starting point, because they're based on the standard bibtex styles.
Christiaan On 3 Mar 2009, at 10:32 PM, James Harrison wrote: > Also, if there was any thought of including my preview template in > BibDesk, I'd want to do a little work on it, perhaps with some help > from someone who is deeply knowledgeable about templates. It works > well for me now, but there are couple of lesser-used bibliography > types that I think could be covered better, and I'm not sure that I am > using conditional punctuation optimally in all cases. If it becomes > more widely used and anyone has any problems, please feel free to let > me know (especially if you know how to fix it!) and I'll try to make > improvements. > > Jim Harrison > > On Mar 3, 2009, at 4:11 PM, Alex Hamann wrote: > >> >> On 03.03.2009, at 18:25, Christiaan Hofman wrote: >> >>> >>> On 3 Mar 2009, at 7:04 PM, Michael McCracken wrote: >>> >>>> Hi, I just discovered James Harrison's RTF preview template [1], >>>> and I >>>> really like it (nice work James). >>>> I have no explanation for why I didn't try it earlier. >>>> >>>> My first impression was that it was nicer than the default, and >>>> probably should be the default (we can obviously keep the old one >>>> around). >>>> In particular, it shows Skim notes - very nice. >>> >>> Actually, I did not include those on purpose, because it can be very >>> long, which makes it impossible to get a good view of multiple >>> selection. I still think that's a good decision. >> >> I actually like James Harrison's template (and use it right now) a >> lot but second Christiaan's objection to making it standard for >> exactly the same reason. Maybe including it in BibDesk would be an >> option. I know that many people don't bother looking at the Wiki and >> just use what they are provided with. >> >>> >>>> I'm wondering if there are other templates for the preview-pane I >>>> should look at? >>> >>> There are a few linked on the Wiki. >>> >>>> Also, what does everyone think about making that template (or any >>>> other improvement on the default) the new default? >>> >>> There is a problem that when we update the template in BibDesk, the >>> users won't see it unless they explicitly revert the templates. >>> >>> Christiaan >>> >>>> -mike >>>> >>>> [1]:http://jhh.med.virginia.edu/main/TemplateNotes#journalTemplates >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Michael McCracken >>>> UCSD CSE PhD Candidate >>>> research: http://www.cse.ucsd.edu/~mmccrack/ >>>> misc: http://michael-mccracken.net/wp/ >>> > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Open Source Business Conference (OSBC), March 24-25, 2009, San > Francisco, CA > -OSBC tackles the biggest issue in open source: Open Sourcing the > Enterprise > -Strategies to boost innovation and cut costs with open source > participation > -Receive a $600 discount off the registration fee with the source > code: SFAD > http://p.sf.net/sfu/XcvMzF8H > _______________________________________________ > Bibdesk-users mailing list > Bibdesk-users@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bibdesk-users ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Open Source Business Conference (OSBC), March 24-25, 2009, San Francisco, CA -OSBC tackles the biggest issue in open source: Open Sourcing the Enterprise -Strategies to boost innovation and cut costs with open source participation -Receive a $600 discount off the registration fee with the source code: SFAD http://p.sf.net/sfu/XcvMzF8H _______________________________________________ Bibdesk-users mailing list Bibdesk-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bibdesk-users
