On Jun 23, 2009, at 10:22 PM, Maxwell, Adam R wrote:

> On 06/23/09 13:04, "Christiaan Hofman" <cmhof...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> On Jun 23, 2009, at 9:25 PM, Maxwell, Adam R wrote:
>>
>>> On 06/23/09 11:48, "Sumit Narayan" <sumna...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Just a couple of feature request I thought I will push in for
>>>> debate here:
>>>>
>>>> 1. When we add a new PDF to BD by drag-and-drop, we get a new  
>>>> window
>>>> for entering the details. It would be nice to see BD automatically
>>>> fill details such as Year, Address and Month if it detects a
>>>> Booktitle
>>>> that was already entered earlier. They don't change across
>>>> publications anyway.
>>>
>>> It sounds like you should use the Crossref field, unless I
>>> misunderstand
>>> your request.
>>>
>>
>> It is generally not possible to figure out any relevant information
>> from the PDF. There is some stuff that tries to find a DOI, Pubmed  
>> ID,
>> or related ID and downloads the information from PubMed, but that's
>> about as far as it goes. The PDF attributes can in theory can contain
>> info like author and title, but in practice just contain garbage, so
>> it's useless.
>
> Quite true, although I've been getting some useful PDF attributes  
> lately
> from online publishers.  PDF has no specific Booktitle field, so I  
> assumed
> the request was related to Crossref...which would fill in
> year/booktitle/date automatically, although the Crossref field  
> itself has to
> be entered manually.
>
>>> You've been able to do that for years, but I think the UI has moved
>>> to the
>>> main menu now.
>>>
>>
>> The popup in the header
>> is really non-standard, and moreover the header doesn't look good  
>> with
>> the source list style. Moreover the connection between a header and
>> some groups way down is really unclear.
>
> I wasn't criticizing this time :).  In fact, I agree entirely; the  
> old UI
> (which I borrowed from Apple's Xcode) was never very intuitive,  
> although it
> was more obvious when there was only a single group type.

I wasn't assuming that either. It was more a reply to the original  
comment, and I wanted to give an explanation why this was changed.

Christiaan


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Bibdesk-users mailing list
Bibdesk-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bibdesk-users

Reply via email to