>
> About group fields, I went to View->Group Field->Add Field and tried to
>> type in "Series", but it gave me a warning that says "Invalid Field: The
>> field "Series" can not be used for groups."
>
>
>
>
> Fields containing some kind of title would be useless for field groups.
> There would just be one group for each item, because titles are generally
> unique, and they also do not consist of a list of unique words like
> Keywords.
If you want to do some matching on a title-like field according to some
> matching criterium, you should use a smart group, as Adam suggested.
I'm sorry, I'm a little confused. Why would an entry like 'series' be
useless for a field group? For series, it's similar browsing articles in a
journal, which listed in the field groups already. Instead, it would be
browsing books in a series, right? Am I understanding it correctly?
Thanks,
Nick
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 9:50 PM, Christiaan Hofman <cmhof...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
> On Nov 23, 2009, at 11:47, Nick Illich wrote:
>
> Thanks for all the info Adam and Christiaan! I really appreciate it.
>
> About group fields, I went to View->Group Field->Add Field and tried to
> type in "Series", but it gave me a warning that says "Invalid Field: The
> field "Series" can not be used for groups."
>
>
> Fields containing some kind of title would be useless for field groups.
> There would just be one group for each item, because titles are generally
> unique, and they also do not consist of a list of unique words like
> Keywords.
>
> If you want to do some matching on a title-like field according to some
> matching criterium, you should use a smart group, as Adam suggested.
>
> The others fields work, such as author (is there a way to link author and
> editor in case there is no author?), year, etc.
>
>
> No, that's not supported.
>
> I'm sorry, I got the wording wrong about the cite key error. It usually
> does it if I try to add more than one PDF and says: "Duplicate Cite Key: One
> or more items you added have a cite key which is either already used in this
> document. You should provide a unique one." Is there an option to turn off
> the warning?
>
> Thanks!
> Nick
>
>
> No. Things may not work properly when you don't have unique cite keys.
>
> Christiaan
>
>
> On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 8:28 PM, Christiaan Hofman <cmhof...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>>
>> On Nov 23, 2009, at 4:21, Adam R. Maxwell wrote:
>>
>> >
>> > On Nov 22, 2009, at 6:52 PM, Nick Illich wrote:
>> >
>> >> One thing I liked about Mendeley, though, was that when I drag one of
>> my PDFs to the program, it gives me a button that allows me to automatically
>> try to retrieve information based on Google Scholar if I type in the title,
>> etc. Is there a way to do something similar in BibDesk?
>> >
>> > Not at present. If you download or copy e.g., BibTeX or RIS data for
>> that citation, though, you can drop it or paste it on the editor window of
>> the reference (at least, I think that still works).
>> >
>> >> I've been able to import information from Google Scholar and other
>> sites through BibDesk before, but only if do it before I add a blank entry
>> with a PDF. Is there a way to look up the information after an entry is
>> created (from adding a PDF there)?
>> >
>> > There's code to do this for PubMed based on the PDF contents, but not
>> Google Scholar. I vaguely recall an AppleScript from Brian Helenbrook that
>> did something similar with other indexes, but the links on the wiki are
>> dead. You could implement something yourself with AppleScript, I think.
>> >
>> >> Also, in recent versions, it gives me a warning whenever I add more
>> than one PDF/blank entries that the cite key is missing. Since I know about
>> it and will add it later, is there an option that will allow me to turn the
>> warning off?
>> >
>> > That sounds odd. Do you have citekey as part of the autofile naming
>> scheme?
>> >
>>
>> Which / what kind of warning are you talking about?
>>
>> >> Also, when there is a translator for a book, what field does it go
>> under? I didn't see a translator field, so I created one, but I was just
>> wondering what others in general used for this kind of situation, if there
>> is an option I do not know of.
>> >
>> > You'll have to add your own, since that's not a standard BibTeX field.
>> BibLaTeX might define a standard field for it.
>> >
>> >> I also really like being able to view all the keywords on the side pane
>> and browse by those. I was wondering if there were other "browse by"
>> options, in particular I'm interested in browsing by the series title,
>> showing all the volumes of a particular series.
>> >
>> > Absolutely. See
>> >
>> > http://bibdesk.sourceforge.net/manual/BibDesk%20Help_33.html
>> >
>> > or search for "group" in the help book.
>> >
>>
>> And you can choose the field to use for the field (keyword) groups using
>> View > Group Field (or the context menu on the header of those groups).
>>
>> >> Finally, if my computer fails for some reason and I have to back up all
>> of my data,
>> >
>> > I recommend backing up before the failure :)
>> >
>> >> would the data links between the pdf and bib file remain in place? For
>> instance, if I retrieve a copy of my bibliography file from a source and
>> also a copy of all the pdfs that it had linked to, will the links break or
>> will it automatically know where to find them? Would they have to maintain
>> the same path?
>> >
>> > As long as the relative path from the .bib file to the linked files is
>> the same, it will just work. There are some other details that have been
>> discussed in the archives, like this thread:
>> >
>> >
>> http://www.mail-archive.com/bibdesk-users@lists.sourceforge.net/msg03651.html
>> >
>> > regards,
>> > Adam
>>
>> More generally: either 1. the relative path, 2. the full path or 3. the
>> file id must remain the same for BibDesk to find the linked file back.
>>
>> Christiaan
>>
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008
>> 30-Day
>> trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus
>> on
>> what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with
>> Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july
>> _______________________________________________
>> Bibdesk-users mailing list
>> Bibdesk-users@lists.sourceforge.net
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bibdesk-users
>>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day
>
> trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus
> on
> what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with
> Crystal Reports now.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july_______________________________________________
> Bibdesk-users mailing list
> Bibdesk-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bibdesk-users
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day
> trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus
> on
> what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with
> Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july
> _______________________________________________
> Bibdesk-users mailing list
> Bibdesk-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bibdesk-users
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day
trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on
what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with
Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july
_______________________________________________
Bibdesk-users mailing list
Bibdesk-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bibdesk-users
