No mike, as shown on this site, bikers organize against Aldermen who
oppose or seem not to support new bike infrastructure? That was shown
on this listserv? Again, I don't live or pay taxes there. Yet some of
your infrastucture is paid with outside monies. As far as "happy with
the funding mix" goes--then ask the resident taxpayers?
EW
Mike Bachhuber wrote:
I haven't heard Madison residents saying
"we're" unhappy with the funding mix."
Have a good day. :)
Mike
(\ /)
(O.o)
(> <)
--- On Wed, 10/28/09, Eric Westhagen <[email protected]>
wrote:
What does "privatization"
have to do with a government license tax for Madison. Then one would
know just how large the bicycle use contingent actually is.
[snip]
EW
Matt Logan wrote:
When the amount of public subsidy for
bicycling infrastructure + human-scaled accessibility exceeds the
subsidy for
roads over the last 75 years, then we will be at what I consider
parity.
[snip]
-----Original
Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]]
On Behalf Of Eric
Westhagen
Sent: Wednesday,
October 28, 2009 6:21 PM
But my only point was the
lack of parity of the car tab and the city bike path tab.
|
|
_______________________________________________
Bikies mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.danenet.org/listinfo.cgi/bikies-danenet.org
