I should point out again at this time that the cop who stopped me for not 
putting my foot down wasn't really interested in traffic enforcement and 
safety.  He was just jacking up bikers, apparently at the behest of a Fitchburg 
city official with a grudge.  That cop was not representative of most law 
enforcement, or even of current Fitchburg government.
Well, maybe a couple of the Madison bike cops...  ;)

------------
Patrick Lenon

Date: Thu, 17 May 2012 21:49:29 -0500
From: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
CC: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Bikies] "stop" legally defined

I actually think it's the wrong approach to advocate for equal treatment, as 
in, treat me just like you treat a motor vehicle. We are different and we 
should be treated differently. I believe we should be afforded equal access to 
a safe and efficient infrastructure, but pretending I'm a car is an easy way 
out. I can't drive down the belt line on my bike and I don't want to-it's 
unsafe and it would severely impact the motor vehicle traffic. Let's advocate 
for equal rights, not equal treatment.

In the same way, I shouldn't ever have to come to a complete stop at a stop 
sign unless the situation truly calls for it. There is absolutely no value in 
me stopping at a stop sign (as opposed to yielding) except that by not stopping 
I might make a driver envious.

There's actually no value in motor vehicles stopping instead of yielding at the 
vast majority of posted intersections. The only reason we have so many stop 
signs is because motor vehicle drivers don't yield very well.

Grant
On May 17, 2012 1:02 PM, "STRAWSER, Charles" <[email protected]> wrote:

I think the tangent we are on is interesting, but deserves a new subject line.
------------Arthur wrote: “Watch motorists approaching a stop sign.  Watch 
their wheels.  Do their wheels completely cease moving if they are not forced 
to stop by a flow of traffic…”
-------------Long ago I heard a law enforcement officer say that even if a 
motorist’s wheels were stopped, it could be argued that “motion had not ceased” 
if the driver only stopped long enough for the car’s body to rock forward  
(over the stopped wheels), then backward (still over stopped wheels), then took 
their foot off the brake and allowed the car’s wheels to start rolling forward 
before the oscillation of the car’s body over the stopped wheels had ceased, 
i.e. COMPLETE cessation of motion (nothing in the statute Arthur cites mention 
that the motion that has to cease only includes “forward” motion).
 I personally think that is perhaps too rigid a view of what constitutes a 
legal stop for a motorist (or a track standing cyclist), but I’d be fine with 
an individual law enforcement officer taking that view as long as s/he 
consistently applied such an extremely narrow view of “stop” to both motorists 
and bicyclists.
 That is, after all, all we are asking for:  equal consideration under the law 
that is due bicyclists by Wisconsin state statutes.
 Chuck Strawser 

Pedestrian & Bicycle Transportation Planner 
Commuter Solutions 

Transportation Services 
UW-Madison 

Room 124 WARF 
610 Walnut St 

Madison WI 53726 
608-263-2969 

www.wisc.edu/trans 
From: Ross, Arthur


 
CHAPTER 340 VEHICLES — GENERAL PROVISIONS
340.01 Words and phrases defined. In s. 23.33 and chs. 340 to 349 and 351, the 
following words and phrases have the designated meanings unless a different 
meaning is expressly provided or the context clearly indicates a different 
meaning:
(62) “Stop” when required means complete cessation from movement.
 
Reasonable people can disagree as to just what this means with respect to what 
behavior by a bicyclist constitutes a legal stop.   Reasonable people can 
include a bicyclist, a police officer, a judge, and/or a jury :- )  
 
Watch motorists approaching a stop sign.  Watch their wheels.  Do their wheels 
completely cease moving if they are not forced to stop by a flow of traffic on 
the intersecting street?  This not an argument for bicyclists not stopping, 
just an interesting study in behavior.  
 
_______________________________________________

Bikies mailing list

[email protected]

http://lists.danenet.org/listinfo.cgi/bikies-danenet.org




_______________________________________________
Bikies mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.danenet.org/listinfo.cgi/bikies-danenet.org                        
                  
_______________________________________________
Bikies mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.danenet.org/listinfo.cgi/bikies-danenet.org

Reply via email to