On Sun, Apr 5, 2009 at 7:02 PM, Evan Hunt <evan_h...@isc.org> wrote: > vigilant; this particular failure won't occur again. And we were already > in the process of making dlv.isc.org substantially more robust, so > hopefully any similar breakages that might have come along in the future > will be stopped before they happen.
Excellent. But what about contingencies for continued dns resolution when an unintended break in the chain of trust occurs? > I expect this to influence future BIND development too (for example, > dnssec-signzone will probably be learning to print a few more warning > messages when it sees legal-but-weird input.) This too is excellent, and I'd hope fixes be backported to 9.4 and 9.5 releases as well. Thanks Paul for the response, very helpful and informative! And kudos to the DLV folks for the service! -- aRDy Music and Rick Dicaire present: http://www.ardynet.com http://www.ardynet.com:9000/ardymusic.ogg.m3u _______________________________________________ bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
