Hey! RTFRFC! :-)
Except a scanning of that RFC doesn't say anything about not using them,
only in clarifying RFC 1034's intentions regarding wildcards.
So, why is it a "very bad idea"?
Peter
Mike Ragusa wrote:
http://www.rfc-archive.org/getrfc.php?rfc=4592
This link should help you.
On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 8:17 AM, ram <r...@netcore.co.in
<mailto:r...@netcore.co.in>> wrote:
On Mon, 2009-10-26 at 11:39 +0100, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 04:01:31PM +0530,
> ram <r...@netcore.co.in <mailto:r...@netcore.co.in>> wrote
> a message of 10 lines which said:
>
> > Is it possible to have a A record for *.domain.com
<http://domain.com>
>
> Technically, yes. It is a very bad idea, but it works.
>
Can you elobarate on that please. If wildcard DNS is a bad idea, then I
need to tell my clients why ?
Thanks
Ram
_______________________________________________
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org <mailto:bind-users@lists.isc.org>
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
--
Peter Laws / N5UWY
National Weather Center / Network Operations Center
University of Oklahoma Information Technology
pl...@ou.edu
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Feedback? Contact my director, Craig Cochell, cra...@ou.edu. Thank you!
_______________________________________________
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
