On 24.02.10 08:31, Lightner, Jeff wrote: > From: "Lightner, Jeff" <jlight...@water.com> > Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2010 08:31:44 -0500 > Subject: RE: Query denied errors on PTR records for delegated zone > To: Jonathan de Boyne Pollard <j.deboynepollard-newsgro...@ntlworld.com>, > BIND users mailing list <bind-users@lists.isc.org> > > Nice write up. It explains WHY we had the weird delegation on switching > carriers a few years back and also explains why I had to put my kluge > in. > > However, I wonder how easy it is in practice to get a company the size > of AT&T to do individual delegations for dozens or hundreds of IPs? > You mention it as if it is a non-issue but I suspect they'd balk at such > a request. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Jonathan de Boyne Pollard > [mailto:j.deboynepollard-newsgro...@ntlworld.com] > Sent: Wednesday, February 24, 2010 4:36 AM > To: Lightner, Jeff; BIND users mailing list > Subject: Re: Query denied errors on PTR records for delegated zone > > I did run into some oddities in setting up arpa zones to be able > to query them inside my network and outside my network [...] > > You've hit one of the several reasons that RFC 2317 style delegation > should be avoided > <http://homepage.ntlworld.com./jonathan.deboynepollard/FGA/avoid-rfc-231 > 7-delegation.html> : Your lookup tools require a specific structure for > reverse-lookup domain names, but your delegation scheme imposes a > different structure. RFC 2317 style delegation broke the convenience > features of your lookup tools. > > > I note it as originally I was pulling my hair out trying to > figure out why digs directly to my DNS server via the internal facing > interface wouldn't resolve like the ones on the external facing > interface. > > You're wishing that you'd read the aforelinked Frequently Given Answer > ages ago, now, aren't you? (-: > > Proud partner. Susan G. Komen for the Cure. > > Please consider our environment before printing this e-mail or attachments. > ---------------------------------- > CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail may contain privileged or confidential > information and is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). If you are > not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of > the contents of this information is prohibited and may be unlawful. If you > have received this electronic transmission in error, please reply immediately > to the sender that you have received the message in error, and delete it. > Thank you. > ---------------------------------- > _______________________________________________ > bind-users mailing list > bind-users@lists.isc.org > https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
-- Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/ Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address. Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu. It's now safe to throw off your computer. _______________________________________________ bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
