Thanks everybody! Everything is fine now! My ISP included my reverse in their DNS.
João K. Em Dom, 2010-10-17 às 10:25 +0100, Matthew Seaman escreveu: > On 16/10/2010 21:48, Kevin Oberman wrote: > > To be completely clear, unless there is special software on the client > > to deal with PTRs, you really only want ONE PTR for each address. Most > > standard network tools tend to assume only one PTR per address and some > > get very confused when multiple PTRs are returned. > > I'm intrigued as to what software it is that gets confused by having > multiple PTRs for IPs? Given I've been running with exactly that > configuration for many years, and never noticed any problems nor had any > complaints. > > Still, I hope this whole argument will be rendered moot with the advent > of IPv6, where addresses are available in such enormous bounty that the > sensible admin would not only assign an IP per network interface, but > pretty much an IP per service too. No more fiddling about with TTLs or > waiting for changes to propagate should you need to shuffle things > about, and a natural consequence is that only one PTR would be needed > per AAAA. > > Cheers, > > Matthew > > _______________________________________________ > bind-users mailing list > bind-users@lists.isc.org > https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users _______________________________________________ bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users