Hello Sten,
Thu, 28 Oct 2010 02:48:36 +0200 Sten Carlsen wrote:
> To me it looks redundant, "named-compilezone -o - zone file" should
> show you how bind interprets these.
> My guess is that they will be listed only once in the output.
>
> I don't see how they could belong to each subdomain, to do that there
> should be a"@..." to set a new origin?
; Set current origin to "mail02"
mail02 IN A 192.168.xx.xx
; Two lines below are still under the same origin "mail02"
IN MX 10 mcvpemr01
IN MX 10 mcvpemr02
; Time to set a new origin
nelson IN A 202.xx.xx.1
[...]
> On 28/10/10 2:14, Ian Manners wrote:
>> Hi Gregory,
>>
>>> mail02 IN A 192.168.xx.xx
>>> IN MX 10 mcvpemr01
>>> IN MX 10 mcvpemr02
>>> nelson IN A 202.xx.xx.1
>>> IN MX 10 mcvpemr01
>>> IN MX 10 mcvpemr02
>>> My question is why would "IN MX 10 mcvpemr01" and "IN
>>> MX 10 mcvpemr02" be repeated trough the zone file surely
>>> this is redundant ?
>> It looks like an old way of specifying the MX for each subdomain.
--
Yours sincerely,
Andrey G. Sergeev (AKA Andris) http://www.andris.name/
_______________________________________________
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
