I believe you could implement what you're looking for with a
reasonably-sophisticated software/hardware load-balancer technology and/or some
number of virtual machines, no BIND code changes required.
Personally, I don't like forwarding much at all -- I only use it where it's
absolutely necessary, due to the presence of a multi-tiers-of-security network
topology -- so this whole discussion pretty much falls into my "trying to teach
a pig to sing" category. Feel free to ignore any or all of my comments in the
thread.
- Kevin
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of [email protected]
Sent: Monday, August 24, 2015 3:21 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: BIND9 Feature Request: 'fowarders' priority & round-robin pools
Somehow all that ^ puffery translates into NOT wanting to allow the user to
prioritize the use of forwarders the way they want?
Um, ok ...
_______________________________________________
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe
from this list
bind-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
_______________________________________________
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe
from this list
bind-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
