http://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/190398/do-i-need-swap-space-if-i-have-more-than-enough-amount-of-ram
- Kevin -----Original Message----- From: bind-users-boun...@lists.isc.org [mailto:bind-users-boun...@lists.isc.org] On Behalf Of Reindl Harald Sent: Tuesday, January 05, 2016 12:19 PM To: bind-users@lists.isc.org Subject: Re: Writeable file already in use Am 05.01.2016 um 18:03 schrieb Barry Margolin: > In article <mailman.13.1452009325.73610.bind-us...@lists.isc.org>, > Alan Clegg <a...@clegg.com> wrote: > >> On 1/5/16 6:26 AM, Jan-Piet Mens wrote: >>>> This might make you sad if you have lots of zones or large zones. >>> >>> .. or even just want to look at what was transferred (whitout having >>> to recurse to a `dig axfr'). >>> >>> I see no reason to omit 'file' (except on a diskless slave ;-) >> >> I ran into one exception to this rule - it seemed that the customer >> had security requirements that did not allow "transient data" to be >> written to disk. They had to make sure that if the physical device >> was stolen, all of their zone data didn't follow it out the door. > > The in-memory copy is likely to end up in the swap partition a proper dimensioned server has no swap partition at all, at least no one od the servers i am responsible since 2008 had one and *for sure* the memory requirement of a authoritative nameserver is pretty clear to don#t need it _______________________________________________ Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users