>It is true at first glance the regex-esque syntax in our I-D may seem a >bit complex but I don't believe anywhere near the complexity of NAPTR
None of the complexity of NAPTR is in the DNS or the DNS servers; it's all in the applications that use NAPTR. For DNS servers, NAPTR is just a record it handles the way it does any other normal record, like A or HINFO. This draft requires every DNS server to change the semantics of wildcards, change the way DNSSEC signatures are computed, and introduces new RRTYPEs that don't work in existing servers the way RFC 3597 says they should. Ain't gonna happen. Really, if you want to do generic rDNS for IPv6, use a specialized server like we do for DNSBLs. rbldnsd is open source, everyone uses it, so you can start with that. R's, John _______________________________________________ Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users