On 19.06.17 10:27, Mark Elkins wrote:
Another solution could be to make one of the names a CNAME pointing to the other name.
No. This would create a real problem, since NS and mail have different AAAA
records.
-or- Just use one generic name for both services. rather than the two "service" names.
impossible, since the info above (and in other threads - different servers.
Although in all honesty, I see nothing wrong with a lookup returning two answers (in a single response packet) for the one reverse query. BIND certainly is not confused. I guess it confuses people?
apparently yes, because this thread exists. There's OP confused about a problem that does not exists. -- Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/ Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address. Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu. - Have you got anything without Spam in it? - Well, there's Spam egg sausage and Spam, that's not got much Spam in it. _______________________________________________ Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
