On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 4:01 PM SIMON BABY <simonkb...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi, > > Are we support load balancing with latest DNSSEC ? I have a DNSSEC > application with unbound library. Do i have to add any extra configuration > to support Load Balancing? > Your question is sufficiently light on detail that it cannot be realistically answered. What sort of load balancing? 1: Traditional SLB - you hand out one IP address, and have a load balancer widget which shares this to multiple backends? 2: Global SLB - you hand out different IP addresses to different clients? 3: Round Robin - you hand out different IP addresses, but randomly / in a order, not tied to specific clients? 4: Anycast - you hand out the same IP address, but this lives on multiple sites, and routing takes care of getting people to the closest site? 5: Multiple nameservers? Something else? The term "load balance" is very vague / can be applied to multiple things - for all of the above except #2, this should just work without any changes. GSLB *may* require more work, but may not. # 5 is sufficiently undefined that it cannot really be answered :-) What *exactly* is the question / scenario you are asking? W > > Rgds > Simon > _______________________________________________ > Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to > unsubscribe from this list > > bind-users mailing list > bind-users@lists.isc.org > https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users > -- I don't think the execution is relevant when it was obviously a bad idea in the first place. This is like putting rabid weasels in your pants, and later expressing regret at having chosen those particular rabid weasels and that pair of pants. ---maf
_______________________________________________ Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
