Thanks Warren. Are we support this with our current release? Rgds Simon
On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 3:04 PM Leroy Tennison <[email protected]> wrote: > Before selecting round robin consider the drawbacks - a DNS server being > down, DNS server inconsistency, an application expecting some kind of > stateful interaction. Finding root cause with DNS round robin can be > challenging. I'm not saying don't use it, your situation may be able to > mitigate/eliminate issues. just do so fully aware of the implications. > ------------------------------ > *From:* bind-users <[email protected]> on behalf of SIMON > BABY <[email protected]> > *Sent:* Tuesday, September 18, 2018 4:39 PM > *To:* Warren Kumari > *Cc:* [email protected] > *Subject:* [EXTERNAL] Re: load balancing > > Thanks Warren. > I am looking DNS RR distribution. (DNS Round Robin Load distribution). > > Round robin DNS is often used to load balance requests between a number of Web > servers <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Web_server>. For example, a > company has one domain name and three identical copies of the same web site > residing on three servers with three different IP addresses. When one user > accesses the home page it will be sent to the first IP address. The second > user who accesses the home page will be sent to the next IP address, and > the third user will be sent to the third IP address. In each case, once the > IP address is given out, it goes to the end of the list. The fourth user, > therefore, will be sent to the first IP address, and so forth. > > Rgds > Simon > > > Harriscomputer > > Join us at the 2018 Momentum User Conference! > Register here <http://www.cvent.com/d/wgqknh> > > > *Leroy Tennison *Network Information/Cyber Security Specialist > E: [email protected] > > > 2220 Bush Dr > McKinney, Texas > 75070 > www.datavoiceint.com <http://www..com> > > TThis message has been sent on behalf of a company that is part of the > Harris Operating Group of Constellation Software Inc. These companies are > listed here <http://subscribe.harriscomputer.com/>. > > If you prefer not to be contacted by Harris Operating Group please notify > us <http://subscribe.harriscomputer.com/>. > > > > This message is intended exclusively for the individual or entity to which > it is addressed. This communication may contain information that is > proprietary, privileged or confidential or otherwise legally exempt from > disclosure. If you are not the named addressee, you are not authorized to > read, print, retain, copy or disseminate this message or any part of it. If > you have received this message in error, please notify the sender > immediately by e-mail and delete all copies of the message. > > > On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 1:22 PM Warren Kumari <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> >> On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 4:01 PM SIMON BABY <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> Are we support load balancing with latest DNSSEC ? I have a DNSSEC >>> application with unbound library. Do i have to add any extra configuration >>> to support Load Balancing? >>> >> >> Your question is sufficiently light on detail that it cannot be >> realistically answered. >> >> What sort of load balancing? >> 1: Traditional SLB - you hand out one IP address, and have a load >> balancer widget which shares this to multiple backends? >> 2: Global SLB - you hand out different IP addresses to different clients? >> 3: Round Robin - you hand out different IP addresses, but randomly / in a >> order, not tied to specific clients? >> 4: Anycast - you hand out the same IP address, but this lives on multiple >> sites, and routing takes care of getting people to the closest site? >> 5: Multiple nameservers? Something else? >> >> The term "load balance" is very vague / can be applied to multiple things >> - for all of the above except #2, this should just work without any >> changes. GSLB *may* require more work, but may not. # 5 is sufficiently >> undefined that it cannot really be answered :-) >> >> What *exactly* is the question / scenario you are asking? >> W >> >> >> >> >>> >>> Rgds >>> Simon >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to >>> unsubscribe from this list >>> >>> bind-users mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users >>> >> >> >> -- >> I don't think the execution is relevant when it was obviously a bad idea >> in the first place. >> This is like putting rabid weasels in your pants, and later expressing >> regret at having chosen those particular rabid weasels and that pair of >> pants. >> ---maf >> >
_______________________________________________ Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list bind-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
