On 10/24/2018 06:15 AM, G.W. Haywood via bind-users wrote:
A server on a non-standard port is often neglected. Its security may be less well maintained than one that is intentionally public.
Why and how do you make that correlation?Are you implying that some people think that because they've taken one step (moving the port) they may think that they don't need to take other steps (updating)?
Do you have, or can you point to, data to substantiate this?I've always found that moving the port is one of many steps done to improve security. The more important steps being stay up to date.
-- Grant. . . . unix || die
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
_______________________________________________ Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
