Thank you ISC, New run with the same input
#9.18.5 pmap -x ... | tail -n 1 total kB 34892476 29399048 29395316 #9.16.21 pmap -x ... | tail -n 1 total kB 27935060 27341676 27338344 The diff. Is still the same ~ 2 GB. I’m pretty much sure you will get the same results in your lab. My guess the earlier experiment with 1 mil zones and small number of machines could not visualize the diff. With 100 MIL of records the diff. is more visual. Hence the same question -> Should the memory reduction apply to our experiment? Please let us know if any additional details about our experiment are required. Regards, Dmitri. From: bind-users <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Victoria Risk Sent: Monday, August 1, 2022 6:08 PM To: Doug Whitfield <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected]; Ond≈ôej Sur√Ω <[email protected]> Subject: Re: High memory consumption in bind 9.18.2 Hi Doug, I think Ondrej is referring to this post from a prior month: https://lists.isc.org/pipermail/bind-users/2022-June/106350.html<https://nam12.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.isc.org%2Fpipermail%2Fbind-users%2F2022-June%2F106350.html&data=05%7C01%7Cdpavlov%40perforce.com%7C76baac03ecbc487cb94708da73cfd124%7C95b666d19a7549ab95a38969fbcdc08c%7C0%7C0%7C637949633668973748%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C2000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=7bHcN%2FQ7y5Azzg0w48fpG46aORYtbOSv9XZFqPZAu9Q%3D&reserved=0> …. For tips on how to measure memory usage you might want to look at https://stackoverflow.com/questions/131303/how-can-i-measure-the-actual-memory-usage-of-an-application-or-process<https://nam12.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fstackoverflow.com%2Fquestions%2F131303%2Fhow-can-i-measure-the-actual-memory-usage-of-an-application-or-process&data=05%7C01%7Cdpavlov%40perforce.com%7C76baac03ecbc487cb94708da73cfd124%7C95b666d19a7549ab95a38969fbcdc08c%7C0%7C0%7C637949633668973748%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C2000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=PmGJoB2tZIhtn3VwEk5VO4gArx1yhqkTSii1OXJ41zo%3D&reserved=0> ….. Also note the comment about ignoring ’total’ memory. Vicky On Aug 1, 2022, at 10:32 AM, Ondřej Surý <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: On 1. 8. 2022, at 16:14, Doug Whitfield <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: as monitored from "top" RES value Please read the whole thread on measuring the real consumed memory. The '“top” RES value' has little or no value at all. Ondrej -- Ondřej Surý (He/Him) [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> My working hours and your working hours may be different. Please do not feel obligated to reply outside your normal working hours. -- Visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list ISC funds the development of this software with paid support subscriptions. Contact us at https://www.isc.org/contact/ for more information. bind-users mailing list [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click on links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. This e-mail may contain information that is privileged or confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete the e-mail and any attachments and notify us immediately.
-- Visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list ISC funds the development of this software with paid support subscriptions. Contact us at https://www.isc.org/contact/ for more information. bind-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
