I am unable to reproduce this. Please share some examples like this:
dig +norecurse @216.239.34.110 www.lathama.org ``` ; <<>> DiG 9.11.5-P4-5.1+deb10u8-Debian <<>> +norecurse @216.239.34.110 www.lathama.org ; (1 server found) ;; global options: +cmd ;; Got answer: ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 28525 ;; flags: qr aa; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 1, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 1 ;; OPT PSEUDOSECTION: ; EDNS: version: 0, flags:; udp: 512 ;; QUESTION SECTION: ;www.lathama.org. IN A ;; ANSWER SECTION: www.lathama.org. 3600 IN CNAME lathama.net. ;; Query time: 58 msec ;; SERVER: 216.239.34.110#53(216.239.34.110) ;; WHEN: Wed Oct 26 18:02:45 UTC 2022 ;; MSG SIZE rcvd: 69 ``` ``` dig +norecurse @216.239.36.110 www.lathama.org ; <<>> DiG 9.16.33-Debian <<>> +norecurse @216.239.34.110 www.lathama.org ; (1 server found) ;; global options: +cmd ;; Got answer: ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 25859 ;; flags: qr aa; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 1, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 1 ;; OPT PSEUDOSECTION: ; EDNS: version: 0, flags:; udp: 512 ;; QUESTION SECTION: ;www.lathama.org. IN A ;; ANSWER SECTION: www.lathama.org. 3600 IN CNAME lathama.net. ;; Query time: 48 msec ;; SERVER: 216.239.36.110#53(216.239.36.110) ;; WHEN: Wed Oct 26 12:03:51 MDT 2022 ;; MSG SIZE rcvd: 69 ``` On Wed, Oct 26, 2022 at 10:07 AM Ondřej Surý <ond...@isc.org> wrote: > You need to be more specific with real examples. > > Ondrej > -- > Ondřej Surý — ISC (He/Him) > > My working hours and your working hours may be different. Please do not > feel obligated to reply outside your normal working hours. > > > On 26. 10. 2022, at 17:41, Veronique Lefebure < > veronique.lefeb...@cern.ch> wrote: > > > > > > Hi, > > > > dig answer is different between BIND 9.11 and BIND 9.16(.33) when > +norecurse option is used. > > Is this documented somewhere ? > > > > Is there an option that needs to be set so that the behaviour of 9.16 is > the same as the one in 9.11. > > > > The change is that with 9.16, if the requested name is a CNAME, only the > CNAME value is returned by dig, while with 9.11 dig would return both the > CNAME value and the IP of the CNAME. > > > > Thanks, > > Veronique > > -- > > Visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe > from this list > > > > ISC funds the development of this software with paid support > subscriptions. Contact us at https://www.isc.org/contact/ for more > information. > > > > > > bind-users mailing list > > bind-users@lists.isc.org > > https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users > -- > Visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe > from this list > > ISC funds the development of this software with paid support > subscriptions. Contact us at https://www.isc.org/contact/ for more > information. > > > bind-users mailing list > bind-users@lists.isc.org > https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users > -- - Andrew "lathama" Latham -
-- Visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list ISC funds the development of this software with paid support subscriptions. Contact us at https://www.isc.org/contact/ for more information. bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
