Hello!
I always was quite sure that Bind will request XFR from the Primary that sent
the NOTIFY.
config:
masters {
X.X.X.4;
X.X.X.20;
};
Bind Version 9.11.5.P4+dfsg-5.1+deb10u8
But I just saw this in the logs that the first NOTIFY is received from .20, but
AXFR is performed from .4:
15:31:17.715 general: info: zone versicherung/IN: notify from X.X.X.20#39334:
serial 1678375865
15:31:17.716 general: info: zone versicherung/IN: Transfer started.
15:31:17.716 xfer-in: info: transfer of 'versicherung/IN' from X.X.X.4#53:
connected using X.X.X.113#43555 TSIG rcode0-distribution
15:31:17.720 general: info: zone versicherung/IN: transferred serial
1678375865: TSIG 'rcode0-distribution'
15:31:17.720 xfer-in: info: transfer of 'versicherung/IN' from X.X.X.4#53:
Transfer status: success
15:31:17.720 xfer-in: info: transfer of 'versicherung/IN' from X.X.X.4#53:
Transfer completed: 1 messages, 82 records, 14703 bytes, 0.004 secs (3675750
bytes/sec)
15:31:20.001 notify: info: client @0x7fdb840c94a0 X.X.X.4#49990/key
rcode0-distribution: received notify for zone 'versicherung': TSIG
'rcode0-distribution'
15:31:20.001 general: info: zone versicherung/IN: notify from X.X.X.4#49990:
zone is up to date
Is there really no correlation between the notification source and the XFR
source?
Thanks
Klaus
--
Visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from
this list
ISC funds the development of this software with paid support subscriptions.
Contact us at https://www.isc.org/contact/ for more information.
bind-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
