> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > Von: bind-users <bind-users-boun...@lists.isc.org> Im Auftrag von Mark > Andrews > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 9. März 2023 21:04 > An: Jan-Piet Mens <l...@mens.de> > Cc: bind-users@lists.isc.org > Betreff: Re: Correlation between NOTIFY-Source and AXFR-Source > > Named just uses the notify to trigger an early refresh process. It then just > asks > the primaries in configured order.There is no real point in trying the > notifier > first.
It depends. If one of the primaries is faster then the other in updating its version of the zone, named as secondary would have the update faster if it talks to fastest primary first. So there can be a benefit. Also if a primary is not reachable, for example maintenance and network issues, then named would not have to wait for timeouts before asking other primaries. So I see benefits. On the other hand, we do not have a problem with the current behavior. Thanks for the clarifications Klaus PS: Latest PowerDNS tries the NOTIFY source first. MAybe someone knows how Knot and NSD behave? -- Visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list ISC funds the development of this software with paid support subscriptions. Contact us at https://www.isc.org/contact/ for more information. bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
