The authoritative source is bind.debian.net that can be redirected. But the primary reason is that I already have the infrastructure ready and I also maintain BIND 9 packages directly in Debian, so the contents mirror what ends up in Debian.
Ondrej -- Ondřej Surý — ISC (He/Him) My working hours and your working hours may be different. Please do not feel obligated to reply outside your normal working hours. > On 21. 6. 2024, at 16:05, Dominic Preston <lzq...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Wed, 19 Jun 2024 at 14:19, Ondřej Surý <ond...@isc.org> wrote: >> >> If by production-ready you mean it’s reasonably well-tested, we are using it >> ourselves and it also matches what’s being uploaded to Debian directly then >> yes. >> >> If you mean there will be no bugs and it will magically work until the end >> of times without any effort then you might be disappointed. > > Thank you for your reply. Out of interest, what is the reasoning > behind hosting the binaries on your sury.org domain as opposed to the > isc.org domain? If (heaven forbid) something should happen to you, > wouldn't hosting on the isc.org domain more easily facilitate the > possibility of redirecting the package hosting without users having to > reconfigure their sources? > -- > Visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from > this list > > ISC funds the development of this software with paid support subscriptions. > Contact us at https://www.isc.org/contact/ for more information. > > > bind-users mailing list > bind-users@lists.isc.org > https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users -- Visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list ISC funds the development of this software with paid support subscriptions. Contact us at https://www.isc.org/contact/ for more information. bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
