Hi Koustav, My opinion on this is to split the visualisations out into a separate package but keep the functions in the existing package. Then when the new visualisation package is released, depend on it from the existing package.
It’s worth asking: Is the package actually worth splitting up? If the two packages are interdependent as a workflow, i.e. if the visualisations apply only to data produced by the specific methods, then there’s no reason to split them up. This happens quite often in package development. The goal is to not let users of your existing package lose any functionality when installing new versions of your package because those functions went to another package. Kind regards, Shian ---- Shian Su PhD Student, Ritchie Lab, Epigenetics and Development Walter & Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research 1G Royal Parade, Parkville VIC 3052, Australia On 23 Aug 2019, at 10:08 pm, Koustav Pal <koustav....@ifom.eu<mailto:koustav....@ifom.eu>> wrote: Hi, I have a curious scenario, I have a package which has some visualisation modules. But, as package development progresses, I think that possibly the visualisation modules themselves might deserve a package for themselves. This would imply, 1. Removing the aforementioned modules from the first package 2. Making a new package for these modules and submitting a new package to Bioconductor. Has this been done before? What are the best practices? To remove the modules entirely? Or to preserve the old ones in the package while continuing development of the new package? Is it then possible to create a suite-like package, similar to tidyverse, where users say BiocManager::install(“Set_of_bla_bla_packages”)? Koustav Pal, PhD Post-Doctoral Fellow in Genome Architecture, Computational Genomics Group, IFOM - The FIRC Institute of Molecular Oncology, Via Adamello 16, 20139 Milano, Italy. Phone: +393441130157 E-mail: koustav....@ifom.eu<mailto:koustav....@ifom.eu> [[alternative HTML version deleted]] _______________________________________________ Bioc-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioc-devel _______________________________________________ The information in this email is confidential and intended solely for the addressee. You must not disclose, forward, print or use it without the permission of the sender. The Walter and Eliza Hall Institute acknowledges the Wurundjeri people of the Kulin Nation as the traditional owners of the land where our campuses are located and the continuing connection to country and community. _______________________________________________ [[alternative HTML version deleted]] _______________________________________________ Bioc-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioc-devel
