Hello, Mike, Thanks for your answer and info about the review process. As recommended by Lori we filled a bug report about the issue.
Thanks again and best regards Carlos A. Catania (AKA Harpo) El sáb., 25 jul. 2020 a las 17:56, Mike Smith (<grimbo...@gmail.com>) escribió: > Hi Carlos, > > I don't think you need to worry about this. > > The 4 space indentation is a style recommendation (not a requirement), and > if the only place that your code isn't meeting that recommendation is the > YAML header then I can't imagine that any reviewer will worry too much > about this. The review process is also a dialog between the package author > and reviewer, so you have a chance to explain reasons why your code may be > triggering BiocCheck messages, and if the explanation is reasonable (as > this sounds) then it will probably be accepted by the reviewer. > > Best wishes, > Mike > > On Thu, 23 Jul 2020 at 22:17, Carlos A. Catania (AKA Harpo) < > harpom...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hello BioConductor Team, >> >> We are in the final steps prior to submitting a new package to >> Bioconductor. As recommended, we want our package to pass BiocCheck with >> no Errors, Warnings, or Notes. However, we have a problem regarding the >> indentation of a vignette written rmarkdown. >> >> -- BEGIN BiocCheck output -- >> [3] "Consider multiples of 4 spaces for line indents, 11 lines(0%) are not >> -- END BiocCheck output -- >> >> The problem seems to be the indentation required for yaml syntax of the >> author section. In the section, we have several authors, affiliations, >> and >> emails using just multiple of 2 space indentation. The problem is that we >> could found a way to correctly indent such a section without breaking the >> vignette construction process. >> >> We have observed that In section 3.1 of the biocstyle vignette about >> authoring using Rmarkdown ( >> >> https://www.bioconductor.org/packages/release/bioc/vignettes/BiocStyle/inst/doc/AuthoringRmdVignettes.html >> ) >> The author and affiliation sections uses just 2 spaces instead of the >> recommended multiple of 4. >> >> So, in your opinion, what would the recommended strategy for dealing with >> this issue? >> Regards, >> >> Carlos A. Catania (AKA Harpo) >> >> [[alternative HTML version deleted]] >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Bioc-devel@r-project.org mailing list >> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioc-devel >> > [[alternative HTML version deleted]] _______________________________________________ Bioc-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioc-devel