OK as long as you can migrate the backup from an old computer to a new one.
Maybe in the future we can provide a migration tool, but until then ...

You are right, the battery should be a standard option not an advanced one.

Regards,
Dan


On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 1:26 PM, Bart <[email protected]> wrote:

> OK should be possible to implement, I take a slight variation to your
> proposal and write the possibility to include another folder based on your
> recommendations. We avoid the possibility that someone accidentally make a
> new snapshot into that folder, and even (in a worse-case scenario)
> smart-removes it because there was less than 1 Gb free...
>
> Another thing: isn't it a good idea to move the battery option from
> advanced to the normal options? It is not really a difficult option and
> every layman could understand what is meant with that checkbox.
>
> Cheers,
> Bart
>
> 2009/12/2 Dan <[email protected]>
>
> Hi,
>>
>> We can recommend not to backup using advanced features. But for the moment
>> this is easy to do and can help migration from one computer to another.
>>
>> I see it like a dialog with a checkbox to enable/disable and the 3 combos:
>> host, user, profile. Each combo will update based on other.
>> Ex: host contains current host and all other host into backup folder, user
>> contains current user and all users in backup folder for selected host (it
>> update if the host combo change) and the profile id contains current id and
>> all id's for current host+user.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Dan
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 6:25 PM, Bart <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> I actually meant to include the --delete-excluded again, as I guess that
>>> would solve the ghost folders problem :-)
>>> -> I once removed it because it caused breaking of the hardlinks,
>>> especially between different scheduled tasks.
>>>
>>> So you mean you should be able to include snapshot folders from other
>>> locations, to be able to restore that one? I might implement that slightly
>>> different as what you described: I will add in the options menu a folder
>>> selection box in which you can add other locations... The only thing you
>>> cannot do is make backups into that other folder. Do want that possibility
>>> as well (it would make the new directory structure awfully messy if you
>>> would allow that)?
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Bart
>>>
>>> 2009/12/1 Dan <[email protected]>
>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> "
>>>>
>>>>> 2. In settings for the shapshots path there should be "Advanced
>>>>> options" to force host/user/profile.
>>>>>
>>>> I do not get what you mean completely? Do you mean that you should be
>>>> able to set these values?
>>>> "
>>>>
>>>> Imagine you want to backup one computer and restore it to another (or
>>>> just another user).
>>>> Because of the new structure you can't restore from someone else.
>>>> You should be able to force this (as advanced options).
>>>>
>>>> About "--delete-excluded". I already remove it :)
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Dan
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 3:54 PM, Bart <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> 2009/12/1 Dan <[email protected]>
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I agree for the beta release.
>>>>>> There are 2 repositories on BIT website: testing & release. We ca put
>>>>>> the beta in testing.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> OK! Good idea!
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 11:24 AM, Bart <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hey all,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I support a new release: the sooner the better, because a lot of bugs
>>>>>>> and questions that are now appearing are already saved or implemented! 
>>>>>>> But
>>>>>>> it might still be a good idea to launch a beta first, for a couple of 
>>>>>>> weeks.
>>>>>>> I think we should do that not on our official repository but more as a
>>>>>>> separate download, or a PPA in launchpad...
>>>>>>> Just to see if we overlooked some bugs...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> However there are some things we might have to fix before launching
>>>>>>> to the real 1.0:
>>>>>>> - There is this KDE bug that causes backintime to freeze: it hangs in
>>>>>>> the compare to phase... It only happens with KDE: 
>>>>>>> https://bugs.launchpad.Bart
>>>>>>> <[email protected]>net/backintime/+bug/441628<https://bugs.launchpad.net/backintime/+bug/441628>(and
>>>>>>>  duplicates)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I'll have a look
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> - If the config file is write blocked it should give a warning:
>>>>>>> https://bugs.launchpad.net/backintime/+bug/480180
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It should show an error. I'm not sure this is a must for 1.0.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> - I still have to add the .gvfs to the default excluded patterns:
>>>>>>> https://bugs.launchpad.net/backintime/+bug/422132
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ok
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> - When a error in the plugins occur it should continue and not hang
>>>>>>> forever: https://bugs.launchpad.net/backintime/+bug/446168
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This bug should be fixed.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> - Add the ionice option:
>>>>>>> https://bugs.launchpad.net/backintime/+bug/378656, as I also
>>>>>>> experience really performance loss when a BiT task is running, what for
>>>>>>> example in case of watching a movie, becomes quite irritating.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> I'm not sure this is a must for 1.0.
>>>>>>
>>>>> It is not a must indeed, would be nice though :-) But you are right,
>>>>> there are more important things to deal with
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> Then we are all OK: no more schedule per included directory.
>>>>>>
>>>>> OK I will stop thinking about fixing the "ghost folders" and add the
>>>>> --delete-excluded again
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> There should be 2 more points:
>>>>>> 1. In <path to snapshots>/backintime there should be an info file with
>>>>>> the structure version.
>>>>>>
>>>>> It is there already: in the info file this information is stored under
>>>>> the snapshot_version:
>>>>> 1 -> old location, old info (all snapshots that do not have a
>>>>> snapshot_version set in the info file)
>>>>> 2 -> old location, with info (this one was actually pretty useless, it
>>>>> was a transfer version, because I thought to include a transfer method 
>>>>> that
>>>>> could distinguish between old and new location, but stored already some
>>>>> information in the info file)
>>>>> 3 -> new location, new info -> the current version
>>>>>
>>>>>  2. In settings for the shapshots path there should be "Advanced
>>>>>> options" to force host/user/profile.
>>>>>>
>>>>> I do not get what you mean completely? Do you mean that you should be
>>>>> able to set these values?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> For 2.0 we can add:
>>>>>> - restore to
>>>>>> - show all profiles snapshots
>>>>>> ...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Lets put a list on the blueprints, and brainstorm further on that
>>>>>
>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>> Bart
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>> Dan
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>> Bart
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 2009/11/30 Richard Bailey <[email protected]>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi Dan,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I looked at the ionice option when I first came to BiT, but I didn't
>>>>>>>> work on it, no.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I see where the schedule per included setting causes a lot of
>>>>>>>> headache. Now that BiT has profiles support this option is most likely 
>>>>>>>> not
>>>>>>>> needed any more so I support it's removal.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The part I was working on is letting the user choose the hour of
>>>>>>>> their backup if the backup is daily or greater; this will help those 
>>>>>>>> who
>>>>>>>> don't leave their computers on all night since BiT runs these backups 
>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>> midnight. Only root has access to anacron which will run missed cron 
>>>>>>>> jobs,
>>>>>>>> regular users don't have this capability.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I'm finished with the gnome side; KDE is the outstanding part and
>>>>>>>> getting it to work properly with the schedule per include option, but 
>>>>>>>> if
>>>>>>>> that is removed it's only KDE to complete.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> - Richard
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 7:03 AM, Dan <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Richard, maybe I'm wrong, but didn't you worked on using ionice
>>>>>>>>> option ?
>>>>>>>>> (I'm talking about
>>>>>>>>> https://bugs.launchpad.net/backintime/+bug/482931)
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Then I'm restarting the debate about schedule per included
>>>>>>>>> directory.
>>>>>>>>> The implementation is tricky and it can break things.
>>>>>>>>> There can be a snapshot consistency problem: you have a schedule
>>>>>>>>> every 5 minutes for a folder and disabled for another. The the 
>>>>>>>>> snapshot name
>>>>>>>>> may look like it was take at a specific moment but is only true for
>>>>>>>>> scheduled folder. This may lead to false bugs too.
>>>>>>>>> Using profiles is a different story: everything is clear.
>>>>>>>>> From my point of view there are more CONS than PROS for this
>>>>>>>>> feature.
>>>>>>>>> What do you think ?
>>>>>>>>> Do you have good reasons not to remove it ?
>>>>>>>>> I'm ready to remove it for 1.0 but I'm not alone anymore on this
>>>>>>>>> project  ... :)
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>> Dan
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 11:31 AM, Richard Bailey <[email protected]>wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Hi guys,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I agree, I think BiT is getting really close for a 1.0 release. I
>>>>>>>>>> would like to finish my work on the Hour of Backup choice though to 
>>>>>>>>>> make it
>>>>>>>>>> into 1.0. I haven't had a chance to finish it yet because of work 
>>>>>>>>>> and then
>>>>>>>>>> my computer died. I should be back up on my feet by this week.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> - Richard
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 6:24 AM, Dan <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Bart & Richard,
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> What do you think, are we ready for the release ?
>>>>>>>>>>> Is there anything you want to change for this release ?
>>>>>>>>>>> I think 1.0 can be a nice Christmas gift :)
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>>>>>> Dan
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>>> Mailing list: 
>>>>>>>>>>> https://launchpad.net/~bit-team<https://launchpad.net/%7Ebit-team>
>>>>>>>>>>> Post to     : [email protected]
>>>>>>>>>>> Unsubscribe : 
>>>>>>>>>>> https://launchpad.net/~bit-team<https://launchpad.net/%7Ebit-team>
>>>>>>>>>>> More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>> "Asking the wrong questions is the leading cause of wrong
>>>>>>>>>> answers."
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>> Mailing list: 
>>>>>>>>> https://launchpad.net/~bit-team<https://launchpad.net/%7Ebit-team>
>>>>>>>>> Post to     : [email protected]
>>>>>>>>> Unsubscribe : 
>>>>>>>>> https://launchpad.net/~bit-team<https://launchpad.net/%7Ebit-team>
>>>>>>>>> More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> "Asking the wrong questions is the leading cause of wrong answers."
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>> Mailing list: 
>>>>>>>> https://launchpad.net/~bit-team<https://launchpad.net/%7Ebit-team>
>>>>>>>> Post to     : [email protected]
>>>>>>>> Unsubscribe : 
>>>>>>>> https://launchpad.net/~bit-team<https://launchpad.net/%7Ebit-team>
>>>>>>>> More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> Mailing list: 
>>>>>> https://launchpad.net/~bit-team<https://launchpad.net/%7Ebit-team>
>>>>>> Post to     : [email protected]
>>>>>> Unsubscribe : 
>>>>>> https://launchpad.net/~bit-team<https://launchpad.net/%7Ebit-team>
>>>>>> More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Mailing list: 
>>>> https://launchpad.net/~bit-team<https://launchpad.net/%7Ebit-team>
>>>> Post to     : [email protected]
>>>> Unsubscribe : 
>>>> https://launchpad.net/~bit-team<https://launchpad.net/%7Ebit-team>
>>>> More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Mailing list: 
>> https://launchpad.net/~bit-team<https://launchpad.net/%7Ebit-team>
>> Post to     : [email protected]
>> Unsubscribe : 
>> https://launchpad.net/~bit-team<https://launchpad.net/%7Ebit-team>
>> More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Mailing list: 
> https://launchpad.net/~bit-team<https://launchpad.net/%7Ebit-team>
> Post to     : [email protected]
> Unsubscribe : 
> https://launchpad.net/~bit-team<https://launchpad.net/%7Ebit-team>
> More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>
>
_______________________________________________
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~bit-team
Post to     : [email protected]
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~bit-team
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

Reply via email to