On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 2:31 AM, Ian P. Cooke <[email protected]> wrote:
> While it wasn't your intention, do you think that asking for > BitC/Rust-level support for something like OpenCL's or Cilk's vector > datatypes is too much to expect? > This is something I'd be willing to look at, but I'd like to get a core language stabilized first. > I agree in part but you're downplaying the combination of concurrent > execution with sequential syntax - it's killer. twisted's Deferred and > other callback-based event models are so clunky and unfriendly to > maintenance that they trip up beginners and experts alike. > Are the C# Async mechanisms any better, in your view? shap
_______________________________________________ bitc-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.coyotos.org/mailman/listinfo/bitc-dev
