On 09/07/2014 7:25 am, "Matt Oliveri" <[email protected]> wrote: > I'm actually getting very tired of the discussion about dynamic > interface vs. static interface as permissions. I've been trying to end > the recent back and forth with Sandro without being rude. > > Basically I don't think you need to worry about dynamic interface as > permissions in the near term because it's only helpful for programming > styles with loads of dynamic type checks. (If even then. Sandro seems > to believe my perspective is never useful.) >
This is my understanding too. You can do sensible security whether you admit downcasting or not, and if you don't have to give it up why would you? Really it is much of a muchness, besides questions about identity.
_______________________________________________ bitc-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.coyotos.org/mailman/listinfo/bitc-dev
