On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 11:43 AM, Jonathan S. Shapiro <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 8:28 AM, Jonathan S. Shapiro <[email protected]> > wrote: >> >> I'm still not sure if [pairs instead of tuples] was a good decision or a >> bad one. > ... > > My gut says that we should clean this up, and introduce a proper tuple type > this time around.
What about records (tuples with not-first-class names for fields)? Don't they screw with the mixfix system at least as badly as tuples? So if you eventually want records, which I guess you probably do, then you'd have to do something pretty similar anyway. _______________________________________________ bitc-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.coyotos.org/mailman/listinfo/bitc-dev
