On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 11:54 AM, Matt Oliveri <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 2:21 PM, Jonathan S. Shapiro <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > What I was trying to say is that when all functions are arity-1 > > the compiler never needs to insert lambda wrappers to turn curried > > application into intermediate function calls that accumulate the > arguments. > > Oh! OK, I understand now. So in other words, because curried > applications are only allowed on functions that are natively curried, > the compiler doesn't need to generate lambdas to curry them. I think that's another way of saying the same thing, yes. shap
_______________________________________________ bitc-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.coyotos.org/mailman/listinfo/bitc-dev
