No, you are misunderstanding. The block size limit (1MB) has been replaced in 
favor of a block weight limit (4M weight). Bytes which must be sent to old 
clients are weighted at 4 units each which is what allows it to be a soft fork.

So as such, there's not two separate limits or anything. 

P.S. what's up with your signature lol


​-Ryan

​

-------- Original Message --------
 On February 18, 2018 11:26 AM, CANNON via bitcoin-dev 
<[email protected]> wrote:

>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA512
>
> I have a question in reference to the increased blockspace enabled
> by the segregated witness upgrade. Is this extra blockspace beyond
> the legacy 1 MB limit limited to just witness data?
>
>
>
>Cannon
> PGP Fingerprint: 2BB5 15CD 66E7 4E28 45DC 6494 A5A2 2879 3F06 E832
> Email: [email protected]
>
> NOTICE: ALL EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE NOT SIGNED/ENCRYPTED WITH PGP SHOULD
> BE CONSIDERED POTENTIALLY FORGED, AND NOT PRIVATE.
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
> iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJaiajLAAoJEAYDai9lH2mwDbMQAKgJseZG9oOoP9WJlESFdAzm
> jLM69KLF4RVWDQjMWCtyVayyolXMLavW6fL4GL7/ztLYSl9Pz+FDlH3Qgo1GLDx4
> fRUkmb0ApLBSAjmdqM+kWjgq3s6/oZaIkNxGeyK5SYY4QhF80Z42PWLBPKjAc7vn
> pe7Im13NwtyJiRuCmq4e1z6GmW86fFOKOsR4rlWcftHOFmH8Gz5d9KK9LbPqU6Ca
> +rde8yb+A9uXEv3O9MqeLId7FYSJixgzFGJosidVkAVQI7YZ0TAfG4HSwKjtqDz7
> SW2Bs3nDeiCr2QN7Su9TUaoSN/yKTBOw5jnql9cNOYuf4GAG0MXWinmYP8MWCiqh
> bIrzvOnlZGapX/36Fpab67VDcFnXJJc8ofqYmn+oUoW/q7geQpu/V1oz+AR9nD/d
> n8wFxvZdRlTbq2XDXySaontxNH0rd80fSG5SJtO5Js9hK/vNG+Xa7Zc+76gEtvlF
> 5G1F6MOcsoXUDCnMteuNxaZx6TPML6RuWVmbR1wXOaX4qZ01p7AsjQlTIcrlVDsB
> LVGW70wjfETBCffn1JQvFmIK7NzggIUuYfLF0IrfM4BrTa/01RnmfBOpWGiIvyIG
> qZqKLYDbW7BDkc/HMtAonR/0t6bTUv/388USSnbMakO9bvih0xxIw4NWTyoSoef/
> I+W6ny7qXt+pegLF4cYL
> =YqEM
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>bitcoin-dev mailing list
>[email protected]
>https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
>

_______________________________________________
bitcoin-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev

Reply via email to