If the new rule is more restrictive the original limit remains.

e

On Feb 18, 2018, at 11:04, [email protected] wrote:

>> No rule has been “replaced”.
> 
> It really has been. The code is no longer checks the size of a block, but the 
> weight of it. For all intents and purposes the block size limits has been 
> replaced in favor of a block weight limit. It's just been designed such that 
> the new rule is more restrictive than the one it replaces.
> 
> Now, I'm not doubting you can argue the semantics on the difference between 
> "replacing with a more restrictive rule" and "leaving the existing rules, but 
> adding a new one" -- but it's uninteresting and only serves to confuse 
> novice's like CANNON into thinking that there are two rules/spaces/limits for 
> transactions.
> 
> 
> 
> ​-Ryan
> 
> ​
> 
> -------- Original Message --------
>> On February 18, 2018 1:39 PM, Eric Voskuil <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>> As a soft fork, all preceding rules remain in effect. No rule has been 
>> “replaced”. Blocks must validate against pre-segwit rules or are invalid. 
>> Additional rules are applied that further restrict validity, and consider 
>> additional (witness) data in the context of the block.
>> 
>> e
>> 
>>> On Feb 18, 2018, at 09:04, Ryan Havar via bitcoin-dev 
>>> [email protected] wrote:
>>> No, you are misunderstanding. The block size limit (1MB) has been replaced 
>>> in favor of a block weight limit (4M weight). Bytes which must be sent to 
>>> old clients are weighted at 4 units each which is what allows it to be a 
>>> soft fork.
>>> So as such, there's not two separate limits or anything.
>>> P.S. what's up with your signature lol
>>> ​-Ryan
>>> ​
>>> -------- Original Message --------
>>>> On February 18, 2018 11:26 AM, CANNON via bitcoin-dev 
>>>> [email protected] wrote:
>>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>>>> Hash: SHA512
>>>> I have a question in reference to the increased blockspace enabled
>>>> by the segregated witness upgrade. Is this extra blockspace beyond
>>>> the legacy 1 MB limit limited to just witness data?
>>>> Cannon
>>>> PGP Fingerprint: 2BB5 15CD 66E7 4E28 45DC 6494 A5A2 2879 3F06 E832
>>>> Email: [email protected]
>>>> NOTICE: ALL EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE NOT SIGNED/ENCRYPTED WITH PGP SHOULD
>>>> BE CONSIDERED POTENTIALLY FORGED, AND NOT PRIVATE.
>>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>>>> iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJaiajLAAoJEAYDai9lH2mwDbMQAKgJseZG9oOoP9WJlESFdAzm
>>>> jLM69KLF4RVWDQjMWCtyVayyolXMLavW6fL4GL7/ztLYSl9Pz+FDlH3Qgo1GLDx4
>>>> fRUkmb0ApLBSAjmdqM+kWjgq3s6/oZaIkNxGeyK5SYY4QhF80Z42PWLBPKjAc7vn
>>>> pe7Im13NwtyJiRuCmq4e1z6GmW86fFOKOsR4rlWcftHOFmH8Gz5d9KK9LbPqU6Ca
>>>> +rde8yb+A9uXEv3O9MqeLId7FYSJixgzFGJosidVkAVQI7YZ0TAfG4HSwKjtqDz7
>>>> SW2Bs3nDeiCr2QN7Su9TUaoSN/yKTBOw5jnql9cNOYuf4GAG0MXWinmYP8MWCiqh
>>>> bIrzvOnlZGapX/36Fpab67VDcFnXJJc8ofqYmn+oUoW/q7geQpu/V1oz+AR9nD/d
>>>> n8wFxvZdRlTbq2XDXySaontxNH0rd80fSG5SJtO5Js9hK/vNG+Xa7Zc+76gEtvlF
>>>> 5G1F6MOcsoXUDCnMteuNxaZx6TPML6RuWVmbR1wXOaX4qZ01p7AsjQlTIcrlVDsB
>>>> LVGW70wjfETBCffn1JQvFmIK7NzggIUuYfLF0IrfM4BrTa/01RnmfBOpWGiIvyIG
>>>> qZqKLYDbW7BDkc/HMtAonR/0t6bTUv/388USSnbMakO9bvih0xxIw4NWTyoSoef/
>>>> I+W6ny7qXt+pegLF4cYL
>>>> =YqEM
>>>> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>>>> bitcoin-dev mailing list
>>>> [email protected]
>>>> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
>>>> 
>>> bitcoin-dev mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
>>> 
>> 
> 
_______________________________________________
bitcoin-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev

Reply via email to