On Thursday 13 December 2018 12:32:44 Johnson Lau via bitcoin-dev wrote: > While this seems fully compatible with eltoo, is there any other proposals > require NOINPUT, and is adversely affected by either way of tagging?
Yes, this seems to break the situation where a wallet wants to use NOINPUT for everything, including normal L1 payments. For example, in the scenario where address reuse will be rejected/ignored by the recipient unconditionally, and the payee is considered to have burned their bitcoins by attempting it. Luke _______________________________________________ bitcoin-dev mailing list bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
