On Fri, Jul 3, 2020 at 12:17 PM ZmnSCPxj <zmnsc...@protonmail.com> wrote:
> > > In fact, one rule of thumb might be that wherever watchtowers are > required, a timelocked bribe might be possible. > > I think a better heuristic is that, if the logic of the construction > assumes "transaction with earlier locktime supersedes transaction with > later locktime", then it is timelocked-bribery-vulnerable. > That's true by definition. Timelocked bribes are, well, going to be possible when there are timelocks. I was going more for an "indirect clue" that wherever a watchtower is proposed, a timelocked bribe is possible. This is entirely a pedantic point :-)
_______________________________________________ bitcoin-dev mailing list bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
